Kashmir Indepth
Kashmir

Article 370 will be referred to larger bench if there is a conflict in earlier two verdicts: Supreme Court

Srinagar: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will refer the Centre’s decision to scrap the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution to a seven-judge Constitution bench only if there was a conflict in the earlier two verdicts of the top court, Scroll.in reported.

Senior advocates Dinesh Dwivedi and Sanjay Parikh, appearing for Prem Shankar Jha and non-governmental organisation People’s Union for Civil Liberties respectively, told a bench headed by Justice NV Ramana that the earlier verdicts were conflicting in nature.

The court asked petitioners to prove a direct conflict between the two judgements. The bench, also comprising of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, R Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai and Surya Kant, told them to furnish their submissions on the conflict by Thursday. “You have to show us that there was direct conflict in two verdicts of apex court. Only then we will refer it to larger bench.”

Dwivedi and Nath referred to rulings more than 50 years old by five-judge benches in the Prem Nath Kaul and Sampat Prakash case, reported The Times of India. They said the top court had said Parliament could not change the character of Article 370, which gave special status to the state, as it was in the form of a constitutional obligation that arose from the instrument of accession signed by the Maharaja of Kashmir.

On Tuesday, Dwivedi had said that Article 370 of the Constitution was the only “tunnel of light” that maintained the relationship between the Centre and the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. “The Article 370 required that action of government of India should have concurrence of Jammu and Kashmir constituent assembly, which was dissolved in 1957 after framing the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir,” he had added.

Senior advocate Raju Ramachandran had argued that with Article 370, while the democratic power is with the state, the executive power is with the Union government.

A number of other petitions have also been filed by lawyers, activists, political parties and other people who have challenged the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which splits the state into two Union Territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, reported Scroll.in.

Related posts

JK reports 217 new positive cases, 115830 recovered so far

Kashmir Indepth

Attack on J&K laborers in Himachal Pradesh creates fear among Kashmiris

Kashmir Indepth

Awantipora Police books two persons for uploading obscene content on Social Media

Kashmir Indepth

2 unidentified militants killed in ongoing Shopian gunfight: Police

Kashmir Indepth

Chief Justice visits Kupwara; inaugurates Bar Chambers, Library at DCC, make-shift court for Sub Judge Trehgam, Munsiff Court Kralpora

Kashmir Indepth

DMA issues guidelines on restarting manufacturing industries post lockdown

Kashmir Indepth

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy