Kashmir Indepth

New Education Policy full of flaws: NISA

Srinagar, June 26,: National Independent Schools Alliance (NISA) Wednesday said that New Education Policy is full of flaws and it is virtually Hidudized.

   While addressing a press conference here in Srinagar Dr Kulbubshan Sharma, President NISA, Thomas Antony, eminent educationist and G N Var, chairman PSAJK said that the implementation of this new policy can irreparably damage education sector.

   Dr Kulbubshan Sharma said that they have been raising the issue and highlighting the flaws in existing education policy all over country and if this policy is not changed and debated, they will start a campaign against it. “If the policy is implemented in Toto in the country, it will lead to destruction of vibrant education sector, Jammu and Kashmir being no exception, he said.

    “NEP is a voluminous document aimed to confuse a common person. An ideal policy document should be around 20-30 pages so that it is easily understood by common people and experts alike, but the NEP 2016 is a huge 498 page document. It looks like a discussion rather than a concrete policy.”

“Give stakeholders more time to discuss and react on it. We demand that the political party should make it part of their election manifesto as the policy concerns entire India.”

“The document has many pages which have been copy pasted from a website in Gujarat. But education is unique to every place and one cannot brush everyone in same colour. Education has unique requirements everywhere. Instead of being personalized, the education sector is being centralized.”

   He said the policy says that the education sector will have Rashtriya Shiksha Ayog (RSA), which will be headed by Prime Minister. Then what is the role of MHRD or education department. It is equal to destroying entire educational governance infrastructure all over India. They should define the role of other institutions if everything will be controlled by PM headed RSA.

“They have B.Ed integrated course after 12th. Then there is teacher eligibility test. If there is B.Ed then why is TET. It is major flaw in the policy. Does it mean that earlier courses like B.Ed are not upto the mark? It is like asking a doctor who has passed entrance and completed MBBS course, to again appear for another test to become doctor.”

  He said there is no sufficient addressing of the crucial issues such as gender, caste and the environment in the draft. Human rights and constitutional rights issues are grossly excluded and Sanskrit and Yoga are projected beyond all reasonable proportions right from school education. As per the draft, Hindu religious dogmas and Varnasramadharma should be injected into young minds in the guise of moral education in schools.

“The policy stresses skill on 80 percent students and quality education for chosen few. It seems the main aim is to make 80 percent students as bonded employees of capitalist world while as 20 percent will have upper edge on them. The NEP destroys the concept of equality and it is anti-poor.”

 He said it advocates Vedic Gurukula system of education which is teacher centric with aim of infusing rigorous discipline among students. This system mars the creativity of children and it is also against the modern and democratic decentred approaches to pedagogy and contemporary educational practice.

“The earlier education policy is not implemented. It has become a corruption oriented and students don’t get benefited. The problem is with implementation, had the earlier policy implemented strictly on ground, maybe we wouldn’t have had so many problems today. The policy had no major flaw, yet it was not implemented and the culprit is the government and governance.”

    “NEP says it will continue Right to Education Act, which is already under dispute, as the government in many states has not paid the dues of students from economically weaker sections. So both students and institutions suffer. We propose why government don’t introduce Direct Beneficiary Transfer policy. Give students an education voucher which can be cashed at any school.”

“The new policy is made by bureaucrats. The TSR Subramaniam committee has five persons, four of them are bureaucrats and the lone non-bureaucrat person is a controversial figure with leanings towards certain ideology.”

 He said the committee that drafted the New Education Policy did not have a single school teacher in it. One is unable to understand the reasons and explanation for it if there can indeed be any. There are nearly 80 lakh teachers in India and they remain the most important unit of effecting changes proposed in the policy. Without their involvement and considerable say in the making of the New Education Policy, it remains to be seen as to how the teaching community responds to it. Not one school teacher can be found in the list of 217 eminent persons the committee consulted.

Related posts

Finance Minister announces major schemes to boost demand in country by Rs 73,000 Cr

Kashmir Indepth

Chief Secretary assesses issues of Cluster Universities Jammu, Srinagar

Zainab Hamdani

Omar asks Gautam Gambhir to stick to his own stuff

Kashmir Indepth

Union AYUSH Minister visits Baramulla, presides over seminar on AYUSH Intervention

Ankit Sharma

Snowfall continues for second day in Gulmarg

Kashmir Indepth

Address Developmental requirements of Shia dominated areas: Div Com to DCs
Reviews arrangements for forthcoming Muharram ul Haram

Zainab Hamdani

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy